Tractor Talk: Episode 16
TYM Cab Tractors are Different
Episode Overview
Tractor Talk 16: These TYM Cabs Are Built Different
Fresh order incoming to Legacy Tractors. Two compact cab tractors from TYM — the T494 and the T574 — and if you are shopping in this horsepower range, this episode is worth your time before you make any decisions.
In Episode 16, the Legacy Tractors crew walks through both machines side by side. Same chassis, same loader, same cab. Different engines — and depending on where your property sits in Colorado, that engine difference is a bigger deal than most buyers realize going in.
There is a reason the T574 exists alongside the T494 and it is not just a number on a sticker. Hit play and you will understand exactly why one of these machines belongs on your property and the other one might leave you short when it counts.
Watch the episode above. Then keep reading — the full community breakdown and FAQ are below.
🧠 AI Insights
Tractor Talk 16:
What the Tractor Community Actually Says About TYM Compact Cab Tractors
To build this section, AI was used to analyze real posts, threads, and firsthand accounts across tractor communities including TractorByNet, Reddit’s r/tractors, r/farming, and r/homestead, the TYM & Branson Tractors Facebook Group, GreenTractorTalk, MyTractorForum, OrangeTractorTalks, and Yesterday’s Tractors Forums. These are not talking points. These are real owners sharing real hours, real repairs, and real opinions formed after putting these machines to work.
🏔️ #1 — Turbo vs. Naturally Aspirated at Altitude: What Real Owners Have Learned the Hard Way
The elevation question comes up consistently in TYM community discussions, and nowhere more directly than in a TractorByNet thread started by a buyer building a homestead at 8,400 feet in the Colorado mountains. He was shopping for a tractor with loader and backhoe in the 50-to-60-horsepower range and had narrowed it down to the TYM T574 specifically because of its Kukje A2300 turbo diesel. His concern was straightforward: at that altitude, would the turbo hold its rated output where a naturally aspirated engine could not? The community’s response was consistent across multiple experienced members. Turbocharged diesels handle altitude far more reliably than naturally aspirated engines, full stop. One TractorByNet member living and working at 7,000 feet in the Rockies stated it directly — with 50 to 60 horsepower on tap, all you have to do is push the throttle up and the power is there. That is not a guarantee you get with a naturally aspirated engine at the same elevation.
The math is straightforward and the community knows it. Naturally aspirated diesel engines lose approximately 3% of rated horsepower per 1,000 feet of elevation gain. That figure is confirmed by TractorByNet members, Yanmar’s own engine technical documentation, and repeated across Reddit’s r/tractors threads on the same topic. The T494’s 48.3 horsepower at sea level works out to roughly 43 horsepower at 5,000 feet and closer to 40 at 6,500 feet before factoring in any working load. The T574’s turbocharger compensates by forcing air into the combustion chamber rather than depending on what the atmosphere provides at that altitude. Multiple TractorByNet members specifically flagged the Kukje A2300’s mechanical injection as an additional advantage — there is no ECU managing fuel delivery, which means altitude does not confuse a computer trying to optimize a fuel map that was calibrated at a different elevation. The engine management is separate from the Tier 4 emissions system, the injection is mechanical, and the turbo does what a turbo is supposed to do.
The TYM and Branson Tractors Facebook Group has documented the real-world production difference in practical terms. Members who have owned both machines or who made the switch from naturally aspirated to turbo report that the advantage shows most clearly under load at altitude — running a brush hog uphill through heavy growth, pushing a loaded bucket up a grade, or running a tiller through compacted soil when the air is thin. The T494 is a capable machine at Front Range elevations and below. West of Fort Collins heading into the foothills and mountain properties, the T574 is the machine that keeps working the way it was rated to work.
✅ Community Verdict: Below 5,500 to 6,000 feet both machines perform. Above that the T574’s turbo is not a luxury — it is the engine that holds its rated output when the air gets thin. Front Range buyers have a genuine choice. Mountain country buyers should start the conversation with the T574.
💪 #2 — Loader Lift Capacity and the TX57: What Real Owners Have Learned the Hard Way
The TX57 loader’s lift numbers generate consistent discussion in the TYM community for one straightforward reason — they are higher than most buyers expect at this price point. TYM’s published specifications put the rated lift capacity at the pivot point at 2,790 pounds at maximum height. In a segment where loader capacity is often the first place a manufacturer cuts to hit a price target, that number holds up. TractorByNet members who compare compact tractor loader specs across brands consistently note that TYM tends to run 10 to 20 percent higher on lift numbers than competing brands at equivalent chassis sizes. It is not a dramatic gap on any single comparison, but it is consistent across the line. One Reddit r/tractors commenter evaluating the T574 against Kubota and John Deere options at a $20,000 price difference specifically called out the loader specs as best in class for the money. That was not a marketing claim — it came from a buyer doing his own side-by-side research before writing the check.
The TYM and Branson Tractors Facebook Group has real working hours behind these numbers. One member reported 850 hours accumulated in 11 months on a T574 used for logging, food plots, and property management — primarily loader and ground-engaging work — with no mechanical failures on the loader system. A separate Facebook group thread asked directly whether the T574 cab could lift a round bale without rear counterweight. The community’s answer was clear: the lift capacity is rated at 2,800 pounds with proper counterweight, and filling the rear tires for ballast is the standard recommendation for any loader-heavy work including bale handling, pallets, and loaded material buckets. The machine will lift without ballast, but the rear tires keep it stable and keep the front axle loaded correctly when the bucket is at height.
The universal skid-steer quick-attach pattern on the TX57 is something the community specifically values for reasons that go beyond convenience. TractorByNet members who have owned multiple brands flag proprietary attachment systems as a real long-term cost — both in sourcing implements and in depreciation at resale when the buyer pool for proprietary attachments is smaller. The TX57’s universal pattern means grapple buckets, pallet forks, material buckets, and bale spears sourced from any supplier will mount directly. You are not locked into a single attachment ecosystem for the life of the machine.
✅ Community Verdict: The TX57 carries more than its horsepower class typically delivers, and the universal quick-attach keeps your options open for attachments from any source. For round bale work and heavy loader cycles, the community’s consistent recommendation is to ballast the rear tires — not because the machine requires it to lift, but because it makes the whole package work the way it was designed to.
🏡 #3 — Cab Comfort, Interior Space, and the Kenwood System: What Real Owners Have Learned the Hard Way
Compact cab tractor comfort generates strong opinions across every community, and TYM’s T494 and T574 cab units have built a specific reputation in owner discussions. On Reddit’s r/tractors, a T574 owner comparing directly against a previous Kubota cab tractor stated plainly that the TYM cab is more comfortable than the Kubota. That comment came in a thread where the buyer was evaluating whether the price difference between TYM and the major brands was justified, and the interior experience was one of the primary reasons he landed where he did. TractorByNet coverage of TYM’s current lineup frequently cites the interior volume on the T494 and T574 as a genuine differentiator — more usable space than some competing Korean brands at the same chassis size, and a quieter operating environment than buyers often expect going in.
The Kenwood Bluetooth sound system draws consistent attention in community discussions because it is standard equipment on the cab units, not an upgrade. At this price point and horsepower class most competing cab tractors do not include a factory-integrated Bluetooth audio system as standard. Adding one aftermarket means routing, mounting, and power management inside a cab that was not designed for it. The TYM system integrates with the cab’s power and speaker infrastructure from the factory. For buyers who run extended daily sessions — hay season, snow removal, long land-clearing pushes — eight hours in a cab with your own audio running is a materially different experience than eight hours of FM radio with commercials every few minutes. Facebook group members note this feature specifically as one of the standard inclusions that competing brands charge extra for or skip entirely at this price point.
The external three-point lift lever and extendable lower link arms get called out by Reddit’s r/tractors members as practical ergonomic improvements that matter in daily use. The lower links extend out past the rear tire so connecting an implement is straightforward from the ground rather than reaching blind over the fender. The lift lever is positioned on the fender outside the cab, reachable without entering or leaning inside. TYM documented a demonstration where someone connected a three-point implement described as easy specifically because of these two features working together. For buyers who regularly swap implements across a single work session, the time saved on every connection adds up across a full season.
✅ Community Verdict: TYM’s cab on the T494 and T574 delivers more interior space, more standard features, and a quieter experience than the price bracket typically produces. The Kenwood Bluetooth system is standard equipment — not an add-on — and competing brands either charge extra for equivalent features or do not offer them at this horsepower class.
🔧 #4 — Reliability, Engine Durability, and the Hours Conversation: What Real Owners Have Learned the Hard Way
The long-term reliability conversation around TYM’s current lineup has shifted considerably over recent years, and the community documents that shift in specific terms. A TractorByNet member who has owned a TYM T330 for 12 years offered the simplest possible summary: nothing has gone wrong in 12 years of ownership. That kind of statement carries weight in a community where owners document every mechanical failure in detail. A Facebook group member running a T574 accumulated 850 hours in 11 months of commercial-intensity use — logging, food plots, property management — and reported no mechanical failures. On Reddit’s r/tractors a 2023 T574 owner at 70 hours reported zero issues and framed his comparison against a Wacker Neuson track loader that had lost all hydraulic controls at 10 hours, started leaking injectors at 15, and was throwing CAN bus communication codes by 20. The TYM had needed nothing.
TractorByNet’s broader assessment of the current TYM lineup is measured rather than promotional, which is why it carries more weight. One veteran forum member with extensive multi-brand ownership experience stated that TYM’s only real negatives in the current product line are dealer-related — availability and support quality — rather than mechanical. He drew an explicit parallel to the trajectory of Korean automotive brands entering the US market, noting that TYM’s confidence level in the community has increased steadily as hours accumulate and failure rates stay low. The Kukje A2300 engine specifically is described by TractorByNet members as among the highest horsepower engines with mechanical injection and a DPF available in the compact tractor market. The Tier 4 emissions system is separate from engine fuel management, which means simpler diagnostics, lower repair costs when something eventually does need attention, and no dependency on dealer software to access the engine.
Known community-reported issues are worth stating honestly. Reddit r/tractors owners note the radiator screen in front of the unit clogs during heavy brush hogging — one owner reported needing to clean it after about five hours of that work, which takes a minute with a leaf blower. Sourcing specific TYM parts independently can require cross-referencing part numbers to generic equivalents, and minor trim pieces like turn signals can carry dealer markups that reward some independent searching. A front axle knuckle seal is a documented wear item — well enough known that an aftermarket reinforcement kit exists specifically for TYM tractors. The range selector on new units can feel stiff initially and may require a specific technique to shift cleanly. Multiple community members documented this as a break-in characteristic that resolves within the first 20 to 50 hours, not a defect.
✅ Community Verdict: TYM’s T494 and T574 have accumulated enough real-world hours across enough owners to move community sentiment from cautious to largely confident. The Kukje engine platform is mechanically simple and field-repairable. Dealer quality remains the most variable factor in the ownership experience — which is exactly the same thing the community says about every other brand in this segment.
⚙️ #5 — Implements, PTO Output, and the Six-to-Eight-Foot Working Range: What Real Owners Have Learned the Hard Way
The implement compatibility discussion in the TYM community consistently centers on a practical working range that lines up directly with what Legacy Tractors covers in this episode. TractorByNet members with T474, T494, and T574 ownership experience report that the six-foot finish mower, six-foot brush hog, box blade, landscape rake, and post-hole digger are the native operating class for these machines. Facebook group members have pushed into seven-foot and eight-foot territory on both ground-engaging implements and mowing work, and the community’s guidance is consistent: the implement type, ground conditions, and terrain slope all determine where the comfortable upper limit actually sits. Running an eight-foot finish mower on level pasture is a different ask than running a seven-foot tiller through clay soil on a slope, and the community is specific about that distinction rather than giving a single blanket answer.
The PTO output difference between the T494 and T574 comes up most directly in the context of altitude and heavy-load work. The T494 and its sibling the T474 share the same naturally aspirated engine variant and produce 35.9 PTO horsepower. The T574’s turbo engine steps that figure up, and at elevation the gap widens further because the naturally aspirated engine is losing rated output while the turbo compensates. For buyers running a PTO-driven implement — brush hog, rotary tiller, finish mower — at any elevation above 5,500 feet, the T574’s advantage is not just about loader pull or ground speed. It is about how much power is actually available at the implement shaft when the air is thin and the ground is pushing back.
Reddit’s r/tractors and the TYM Facebook community both document the two-speed hydrostat range selector as something that can feel stiff on a new machine. Multiple owners reported it requires deliberate technique initially — light pedal pressure, sometimes a slight turn of the steering wheel — and that it becomes natural after the first 20 to 50 hours. TractorByNet members with experience across multiple brands noted that range selector stiffness is not unique to TYM and improves with use across most brands in this class. New T494 and T574 owners should expect it rather than be surprised by it.
✅ Community Verdict: For six-to-eight-foot implements across a working property in the five-to-one-hundred-acre range, both the T494 and T574 are correctly matched machines. The T574’s PTO output advantage shows most clearly at altitude and under sustained heavy load. The range selector stiffness on new units is a documented break-in characteristic — it resolves with hours.
🔧 The Legacy Tractors 10-Point Inspection — Why It Applies Here
Every reliability concern the community documents — front axle seal condition, hydraulic fluid levels, loader mount integrity, fluid checks across all systems — is exactly what Legacy Tractors addresses on every tractor that comes through the bay. We give a full 10-Point Inspection on all our new, used, and consignment tractors before they receive approval for sale. That covers fluids, wheel ballast, hydraulics, steering, structural integrity, and more. When you are buying a new TYM T494 or T574 from Legacy Tractors, you are starting with a machine that has been gone over by people who know what to look for. No surprises in the first 20 hours. That is what the inspection process is for.
Frequently Asked Questions: TYM T494 and T574 Compact Cab Tractors
What is the difference between the TYM T494 and T574?
The T494 and T574 sit on identical chassis and share the same cab, loader, and three-point hitch architecture. The core difference is the engine. The T494 runs a naturally aspirated Kukje A2300 diesel producing 48.3 horsepower. The T574 takes the same engine family, adds a turbocharger, and raises the output to 55 horsepower with additional low-end torque and better sustained output under load. Both machines carry the TX57 front-end loader, two rear remotes standard, extendable lower link arms, an external three-point lift lever, and the same Kenwood Bluetooth cab interior. TractorByNet members who have evaluated both describe the chassis and operator experience as interchangeable — the turbo and the horsepower difference are the meaningful variables. On Reddit’s r/tractors, one owner who was deciding between the two noted the price difference at their dealership was approximately $400 for the T574 over the T494. Given that gap, they chose the T574. The broader community recommendation, particularly for buyers in Colorado and the mountain west, is to treat the elevation of the property as the deciding factor. Front Range and eastern plains buyers have a genuine choice. Buyers working above 5,500 to 6,000 feet should lean toward the T574’s turbo engine.
Is the TYM T574 a good tractor for high-altitude use in Colorado?
The T574 handles high-altitude operation better than most compact tractors in its horsepower class, and the reason is the Kukje A2300 turbocharger. Naturally aspirated diesel engines lose approximately 3% of rated horsepower for every 1,000 feet of elevation gain — a figure confirmed across TractorByNet discussions and by Yanmar’s own engine technical documentation. At 7,000 feet a naturally aspirated tractor rated at 48 horsepower is producing closer to 40 horsepower under working conditions. The T574’s turbo compensates for lower atmospheric oxygen by force-feeding the combustion chamber, which is exactly why TractorByNet members working properties at 7,000 to 8,400 feet in the Colorado Rockies specifically call out the T574’s Kukje turbo diesel as the right call for mountain terrain. One TractorByNet member building a homestead at 8,400 feet — with extensive heavy equipment experience — evaluated TYM, Kioti, and LS before landing on the T574’s Kukje engine specifically because of the mechanical injection simplicity and the turbo’s altitude compensation. The Kukje A2300’s mechanical injection means altitude does not interfere with a computer-managed fuel map. It is a straightforward mechanical system that responds to what the engine needs without electronic intervention tied to the fuel delivery side.
What is the TX57 loader and how much can it lift?
The TX57 is TYM’s factory-matched front-end loader for the T494 and T574 chassis. TYM’s published specifications put the rated lift capacity at the pivot point at 2,790 pounds at maximum height. In the TYM and Branson Facebook Group, members running the T574 through heavy loader work including round bale handling and logging reported no loader system failures across hundreds of hours. The loader runs a universal skid-steer quick-attach pattern, which the TYM community specifically values because it keeps implement sourcing open to any supplier rather than locking you into a proprietary ecosystem. TractorByNet members who compare compact tractor loader specs note that TYM’s numbers tend to run 10 to 20 percent higher than competing brands at equivalent chassis sizes — not dramatically, but consistently. For buyers who need working margin into the one-ton range for round bales, loaded material buckets, and pallet work, the TX57 provides that overhead without requiring a step up to a larger machine. The community’s consistent recommendation for loader-heavy work is to ballast the rear tires — calcium chloride solution, water, or beet juice — to counterbalance the front load, maintain rear traction, and keep the center of gravity low during the lift cycle.
Does the TYM T494 or T574 come standard with a Kenwood sound system?
Both the T494 Hydrostat Cab and T574 Hydrostat Cab come standard with a Kenwood Bluetooth sound system as a factory-installed feature. This is not an add-on or upgrade package — it is included with the cab configuration on both machines. Most competing cab tractors in the same horsepower and price range do not include a factory-integrated Bluetooth audio system as standard equipment. Adding one aftermarket requires routing, mounting, and power management inside a cab that was not designed for it. The Kenwood system in the TYM cab integrates with the cab’s power and speaker infrastructure so it functions the way it was designed to from day one. Facebook group members who have compared TYM cab units against competing brands note this feature consistently as a standard inclusion that others charge extra for or skip entirely at this price point. For buyers who run extended daily sessions — hay season, snow removal, long land-clearing work — the difference between your own audio via Bluetooth and FM radio with commercial interruptions every few minutes is a real quality-of-life factor across a full working season. It is one of those details that does not show up in a spec sheet comparison but comes up repeatedly in owner satisfaction discussions.
What implements can I run on the TYM T494 and T574?
Both the T494 and T574 are correctly matched to six-foot to eight-foot implement categories across the primary working tasks compact property owners encounter. Six-foot and seven-foot brush hogs are the most common PTO-driven implements discussed in the TYM community, followed by six-foot finish mowers, box blades, landscape rakes, tillers, and post-hole diggers. TractorByNet members with T494 and T574 ownership experience describe the six-to-seven-foot range as the reliable daily working class for these machines, with eight-foot implements workable depending on implement type and ground conditions. The T574’s turbo engine provides more usable PTO horsepower — particularly at elevation — which opens the upper end of that implement range more reliably than the naturally aspirated T494 in demanding conditions. For loader work, both machines run pallet forks, bale spears, grapple buckets, and material buckets via the TX57’s universal quick-attach. Implement compatibility is not a limiting factor with the TX57 — the universal skid-steer pattern means sources are effectively unlimited and you are not dependent on TYM-specific attachment suppliers for the life of the machine.
Is the TYM T494 or T574 good for round bale work?
Round bale handling is one of the most discussed use cases across TYM community forums and both machines get consistently positive marks for it. The TX57 loader’s rated lift capacity at full height — 2,790 pounds at the pivot point — provides the overhead needed for round bale work without putting the machine at its limits on every cycle. On Reddit’s r/tractors the original poster of a T494 purchase thread specifically cited round bale handling as a primary requirement, asking whether the machine could handle it at a $20,000 savings over Deere and Kubota. The community’s response was direct and affirmative. A bale spear mounted via the universal quick-attach is a standard attachment and the lift numbers are sufficient for typical round bale weights in the 1,000 to 1,500-pound range without issue. The TYM and Branson Facebook Group documents members running round bale handling as a primary use case across hundreds of hours without loader system failures. The community’s consistent recommendation for bale work specifically is to ensure the rear tires are properly ballasted to counterbalance the front load, maintain rear traction, and keep the machine stable during the lift and carry cycle. At Legacy Tractors, wheel ballast condition is part of the 10-Point Inspection on every tractor that goes through the service bay.
What should I know about the three-point hitch on the T494 and T574?
The three-point hitch on the T494 and T574 is a Category 1 system with a published lift capacity of approximately 2,866 pounds at the link ends. The feature that draws the most community attention is the extendable lower link arms that pull out past the rear tire, combined with the external lift control lever positioned on the fender outside the cab. Connecting a three-point implement on a cab tractor typically requires reaching over or around the rear of the machine to guide the link pins onto the implement. The T494 and T574’s extendable arms change that dynamic — the link ends come to you rather than requiring you to reach past the tire blind. The external lift lever means you can raise and lower the hitch from the ground without entering the cab or leaning inside. Reddit’s r/tractors members with direct T494 and T574 experience call the external lift handle out specifically as a practical convenience that makes a real difference during implement changes. TYM documented a demonstration where someone connected a three-point implement and described it as straightforward specifically because of these two features working together. For buyers who swap implements regularly across a single work session, the time saved on every connection compounds across a full season of use.
What are the known issues with the TYM T494 and T574?
The TYM community documents a short list of known characteristics and minor issues worth knowing before you buy. The radiator screen in front of the unit clogs during heavy brush hogging — Reddit r/tractors owners report needing to clean it after roughly five hours of that work, which takes about a minute with a leaf blower directed from the back side of the radiator. The range selector on new units can feel stiff and requires deliberate technique to shift cleanly — light pedal pressure, sometimes a slight turn of the steering wheel. Multiple TractorByNet and Facebook group members documented this as a normal break-in characteristic that resolves within the first 20 to 50 hours and is not unique to TYM across brands in this class. Parts sourcing independently can require some cross-referencing of part numbers to find generic equivalents, and specific trim pieces like turn signals can carry dealer markups that reward a bit of independent searching. The front axle knuckle seal is a documented wear item — well enough known in the community that an aftermarket reinforcement kit exists specifically for TYM tractors. None of these are disqualifying issues. They are the kind of ownership realities that experienced buyers know going in rather than discovering after the fact.
How does the TYM T494 compare to competing brands at the same price point?
The TYM community’s honest assessment of where the T494 sits relative to competing brands at the same price point is fairly consistent. The loader lift numbers are higher than most competing brands at equivalent chassis sizes — TractorByNet members put the advantage at roughly 10 to 20 percent more lift capacity per dollar compared to the major Korean and Japanese brands. The standard feature package — Kenwood Bluetooth, full heat and air conditioning, extendable lower links, external lift lever, two rear remotes — represents equipment that competing brands either charge extra for or do not offer at this price point at all. The price gap versus Kubota and John Deere is significant. Reddit r/tractors members evaluating the T494 against orange and green options consistently cite savings in the $15,000 to $20,000 range for equivalent horsepower and cab configurations. The trade-off the community identifies honestly is parts availability and dealer network depth — TYM’s dealer footprint is smaller than Kubota or Deere, and independent parts sourcing requires more effort. One TractorByNet veteran framed it this way: the only real negatives in TYM’s current lineup are dealer-related, not mechanical. For buyers with a quality local TYM dealer, the value proposition is strong. For buyers in areas with limited dealer support, that factor deserves weight in the decision.
How reliable is the Kukje engine in the TYM T494 and T574?
The Kukje A2300 engine family has accumulated a reliability track record in the TYM community that has moved owner sentiment from cautious to largely confident over the past several years. TractorByNet members describe the engine as among the highest-horsepower mechanically injected engines with a DPF available in the compact tractor market. The Tier 4 emissions system — a DOC and DPF combination — is separate from the engine fuel management system, which means the engine itself has no ECU governing fuel delivery. Diagnostics are straightforward, repairs are accessible to a competent mechanic without proprietary software tools, and the mechanical injection system does not have the failure modes or cost profile of common-rail electronic injection. TYM owns Kukje, which means the engine supply chain is internal to the brand rather than dependent on a third-party supplier relationship. Community members with 12 years and hundreds of hours on Kukje-powered TYM machines report no major engine failures. The most significant caveat the community notes is that long-term data beyond the 500 to 1,000-hour mark is still accumulating compared to Kubota and Yanmar engines with decades of community ownership history behind them.
Where can I buy a TYM T494 or T574 cab tractor in Northern Colorado?
Legacy Tractors in Fort Collins, Colorado carries TYM as one of its three primary brands alongside LS Tractor and KIOTI. A fresh order of TYM T494 and T574 Hydrostat Cab units is on the way to the lot now. Every tractor that comes through Legacy Tractors goes through a full 10-Point Inspection covering fluids, wheel ballast, hydraulics, steering, structural integrity, and more before it receives approval for sale. Whether you are buying new or looking at used and consignment inventory, the machine has been gone over before the conversation about price ever starts. The Legacy Tractors team will walk you through both cab units in person, answer every question honestly, and help you match the right machine to your property and your elevation. Visit legacytractors.com to see current inventory or stop by the lot in Fort Collins. If you are working property above 6,000 feet and trying to decide between the T494 and T574, bring that question with you — it is one worth answering in person with both machines on the lot.
TYM Tractor
Near Me
Are you looking for a TYM tractor dealer near you?
You can find a TYM tractor in Ft. Collins, CO, conveniently located to serve the surrounding areas.
Visit us today and explore our range of TYM tractors, parts, and services.
Get directions from your current location by clicking the button below.
Build a Custom
TYM Tractor Package
"*" indicates required fields
LEGACY TRACTOR SALES & SERVICE, INC.
1845 North College Avenue • Ft. Collins, CO 80524
(970) 482-4803 • info@legacytractors.com

TYM Tractor